While it could be said that having a US military base has its pluses, it could also be said that it definitely has its minuses, as well. The problem with a United States base on one’s homeland is first of all, a given country wants to believe that it is sovereign in its governance, and when a foreign power, even a friendly foreign power, has a military base within one’s own country, this does pose the problem as to how sovereign a nation really is, because the military presence of a foreign nation makes it all seem a little bit more problematic, and probably is not something that reflects that a given nation is really all that independent, strong, or clearly in the driver’s seat.
The thing about Charles de Gaulle is that this important and brave general, who later became the President of France, knew an awful lot about war, because he was there during some of the darkest times for the nation of France. So too, because he believed in the French Republic, he did not see it as being wise to permit permanent United States bases on the French homeland, and in 1966, he withdrew France from NATO’s integrated military command structure, which thereby meant that all US forces would have to be withdrawn, and that subsequently became the case.
Indeed, we find that major European countries such as Germany, United Kingdom, Poland and Italy all have US military bases, which really does demonstrate that France is a true outlier, which is to their credit, because the mistake that many nations that permit US bases upon their land make is to misunderstood who is the master of those US military bases, in which the words on paper do not really matter, for the master is the United States, and therefore when push comes to shove, the United States will pretty much do what it damn well pleases to do with the armaments and personnel that are on the US bases, and thus cares not a whit, what the home country might have to say.
In truth, there comes a time when a child no longer feeds at her mother’s breast, and therefore it could be said that all those nations that have permitted or allowed the United States to have a military base upon their shores, should probably reflect that having such a military base represents a dual-edge sword, and in consideration, that not all that the United states does is embraced by a given country, it should be taken into fair consideration, that not every deal made with the best of intentions, is a good deal, and having foreign troops positioned in perpetuity on one’s homeland would seem to be problematic, and at a minimum be subject to domestic debate and review, because at the end of the day, what military actions occurs from a given country’s homeland matters, and when that is determined solely by a friendly foreign power, it might not be in that country’s best interests, at all.