Once you have it, you never willingly give it back by kevin murray

America, prides itself on being a country that purports to demonstrate in principle, how beneficial that its capitalistic system is, and further what an egalitarian society that we live in; as opposed to those other nations, in which those that are born into money, have it, generation after generation; and/or that those that are born into power, have that, generation after generation.

 

In point of fact, America today is clearly a country of the very rich, by the very rich, and for the very rich, and the situation is getting worse, year by year.  In fact, as reported by Bloomberg.com, "…the top 0.1% of taxpayers—about 170,000 families in a country of 330 million people—control 20% of American wealth."  This fact doesn't not necessarily signify the corruption of our capitalistic system, but it sure the heck seems to indicate that there is something fundamentally wrong with the way that capitalism and our tax system are exercised in this country; for somehow, the concentration of that wealth at the very top, keeps getting concentrated more and more, year by year, all at the expense of the good people of this great nation, as a whole.

 

In point of fact, the very basis of wealth concentration in America comes down to firstly being able to obtain or to earn or to inherit the money, and the second part of the equation is being able to hold onto that wealth, generation after generation, which means never having to suffer the ill effects of confiscatory taxation or similar of that wealth. 

 

What most citizens of this country seemingly fail to recognize, is that wealth concentration is always a two-step process, of which the first is the obtainment of that money, and the second is the retention of that money as well as typically the continual growth of that money, for money makes money, literally; for the growth of lots of money once obtained, often comes down to the investing of it, and has little or nothing to do with the laboring for it.

 

The bottom line is that those that are wealthy, are in many cases, obsessed with maintaining that wealth that has been established, so that, in acknowledgement that money and especially lots of money has influence, are well prone to utilize that money to buy tax favoritism, political favoritism, business favoritism, and just about any favoritism that can be bought.  All of this is done for the expressed purpose to not give up and to not give ground of the fortunes so created, which is why the most valuable estates are able to circumvent onerous taxation, and which is why foundations are created so that laws can therefore be enacted specifically to favor powerful interests in which those interests that are the true beneficiaries of such are often well hidden through those foundations.

 

Those that are super wealthy, are more than willing to spend some of their wealth, in order to maintain and to keep such wealth, and do so time and time again; which is why America, despite its founding principles from its inception, being anathema to dynastic wealth, is now a country that protects and augments dynastic wealth, to the destruction of its middle class, and the continual suppression of its embarrassingly large lower class.

 

The superrich will not give up what it already has, which is that wealth, and when the government of this great nation accedes and actively augments the superrich's wealth and their ability to keep it, generation after generation, then the superrich will just keep seizing a bigger and bigger piece of the wealth of America for themselves.

There is no deist God by kevin murray

People have all sorts of different beliefs in God, of which, quite obviously not all of these beliefs can conceivably be correct.  There are some that believe, for instance, that God has died, which reflects their ignorance and their inability to fathom what immortality actually represents.  Further, there are those that believe that God did create this world, and thereupon left it to be on its own, that is, a deistic God, which to a certain degree makes sense, for from there one can then more logically conclude because God takes no active role in this world, that this is why this world is in such a mess, and helps to explain why bad things happen to good people. 

 

In point of fact, God is not deistic, and never was; for God is our Creator, and as our Creator, God cares about all that He has created.  Further to the point, it is God that sends saviors and gurus amongst us, in order to aid us in coming to the awareness of truth, justice, love, and the meaning of life.  Yet, many people point again and again to all the pain and suffering in this world, as proof positive that either God does not really exist, or that God doesn't care, or that God started the creation and basically walked away from such.  While, this might seem to be a conundrum, it really is not, for either we have all been blessed with free will, or we are all puppets in the hands of the Master Puppeteer. 

 

The truth is that it is free will, that creates all that is wrong in this world, yet, at the same time, it is that free will, that brings forth all the positives that we do have and experience in this world, for free will, is free to choose whichever path it so desires to be on.  So too, it is from that free will, that great souls incarnate amongst us, for God ever hears our cries, and answers those cries by bringing into our midst, those that will lead us to the promise land, if only we would first listen and then be faithful to that Voice.

 

Far too many people, wrongly believe that if God exists, that God would thereby obey their commands and their petitions to God; but how is it that those that are in this world, are wiser than He that is the Fountain of Wisdom?  After all, those that do not know the whole Truth, and are unable to fathom what is really going on, are consequently not in the position to actually know what is best for them; nevertheless, we read in Luke 16: 7, "The Lord said, “If you had faith like a grain of mustard seed, you would tell this sycamore tree, ‘Be uprooted, and be planted in the sea,’ and it would obey you."  So then, it is our lack of faith that precludes the miracles that we claim to really want as well as to really desire, of which, those that are truly attuned and at one with God, are thereby able to accomplish such, seamlessly.

 

God is here in every aspect of this world, and in every corpuscle of our being.  God cares for each one of us, and knows us better than we even know ourselves.  Our obligation therefore is to search diligently for God, and when we find God and adhere to God's law, everything will change, for formerly we were blind, but now we will see.

Why the whole truth matters by kevin murray

The greatest search that anyone can aspire to, is that search for the whole truth of our existence, and therefore of who and what we really are.  Those that will not put forth the effort for that search may indeed still have noble and worthy lives, but they have apparently done so, without clearly discerning the most important truth.  Additionally, there are others, because they know not the whole truth, and apparently have no interest or inclination to know such, that suffer in lives in which the knowing of that whole truth, would have made a positive impact upon their perspective and therefore their decisions.  Not only is the knowing of the whole truth, vital to each one of us, but the fact that a significant swath of mankind does not know that whole truth, and further that so many don't seem inclined to want to examine such, is the most significant reason why this world is so often a world of sorrow and suffering.  Additionally, there are privileged others who know not and care not for the whole truth, because they are happy and satisfied with life as it is for them, but they will find to their dismay, eventually and belatedly that such self-satisfaction will have its price to pay.

 

As mankind has gotten more clever and knowledgeable about the nature of this material world, so many of these people, have thereupon traded their inclination for spiritual insight for their mastery of material things, believing that the more that they know of this world, the more that they can become godlike in their attributes.  So that, because so many believe only in what they can see and thereby measure by mankind's eyes and instruments, the more that they believe that all that there ever is and all that will ever be, is material in nature, and therefore a belief in a Higher Power is a version of mythology and of no concern, though to maintain this belief, often means to ignore the elephant within the room, for those that think that way, will often dismiss any and all evidence that sheds logical doubt upon that belief.

 

In point of fact, all those that insist upon vacating the whole truth, are the reason why the construct of peace, love, harmony, truth, justice, and fairness will never gain universal traction.   Mankind must learn to come to realize that the actuation behind mankind is and always has been eternal, and until such a time as mankind recognizes the wisdom of that Eternal, then mankind will continue to suffer as it does, so often, in so many aspects of this world.

 

The whole truth consists in the knowing that all of us, without exception, has been created equally by the omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent God; that has provided to each one of us, the freedom to discover whatever that it is, that we so desire, recognizing that in that discovery, thoughts become actions, and actions become deeds, in which all of those deeds that are inimical to truth, justice, and harmony bring forth disharmony, of which amends must be made to correct such, for that which is disharmonious cannot merge back into that which is harmony, actualized.

 

To know the whole truth is the very basis to get back to that which we are -- which is that each one of us is a part of the Greater Whole; and therefore the suffering, pain, hate, and frustration, that we invariably experience here on earth, are the ever present thorns, to wake us up and to prick our consciousness so as to thereupon make it our point to get right and thereby successfully journey Home.

True repentance by kevin murray

Most everyone that believes in an afterlife, consisting of a Heaven and a hell, would vastly prefer to go to Heaven.  For some of those people, they somewhat conveniently believe that if they take, for instance, Christ as their savior, that this will save them, and therefore that they will be redeemed in Christ's blood and thereby go to Heaven.  We might call such a belief, such as this, if we are charitable, Christianity light, but whatever that it is called, it fails to acknowledge that to get to Heaven, actually requires much more than some sort of nebulous and soft belief, but rather, such requires real commitment and real sacrifice.

 

In point of fact, we read in Holy Scripture, "Be careful. If your brother sins against you, rebuke him. If he repents, forgive him" (Luke 17: 3).  This scriptural passage, indicates that those that perform actions that are morally wrong, need to be informed of their error, and that further, that they need to disavow their previous behavior and to thereby turn away from that wrong path, and to take and thereby to embrace the right path.  Having done that, they should therefore be forgiven and thereupon be embraced as a fellow believer.

 

However, it must be stated, that true repentance is never going to be about just promising to forsake one's errors and sins, and thereupon promising to perform acts of good and righteousness for others; but rather, the proof is in the activities so performed after the commitment to repentance has been made.  So that, the mind must first be made right, and then the actions so enacted must be in conformance with those thoughts, actuated.

 

Obviously, even those that sincerely wish to repent are not going to be able to somehow instantly become perfect in all of their conduct, but what should and must occur, is that the mindset stays attuned to what is the appropriate behavior and true; in conscious acknowledgement that one has forsaken their former ways in order to embrace the superior way, through their diligent and determined efforts. 

 

It must be remembered, that there are not any shortcuts to Heaven, for Heaven is something that involves dedicated effort and accomplishments, for to achieve Heaven, first necessitates the honest acknowledgment of our errors, which thereupon leads us to the renouncing of such as being not acceptable to our persona, and thereby the final step is the demonstrated proof, that we have put off the old, and thereupon have embraced the new, by doing right and by being good in all of our endeavors.

 

Those that claim that they are going to Heaven, because they believe, are mistaken in their viewpoint, that something as ambiguous as belief, is going to actually be good enough to do such.  Instead, one should concern themselves far less about belief, or faith, for that matter, and resolve to admit to and to own up to one's errors, and thereupon to recognize that now knowing better, that one needs to fully repent of all that one has done which is evil and morally wrong, and instead resolve to do all of the good that one can do, for as long as one can do such, for as many people as one can influence upon, to the best of one's ability, and Heaven will thereupon be the fair reward.

Unintended pregnancies and reasonable solutions to such by kevin murray

Birth control, unintended pregnancies, and abortions, are a combined subject matter that some people have fanatical viewpoints upon, in which some of these people believe absolutely that one's body is one's own, and therefore that women should be entitled to have abortions on demand.  On the other hand, there are those other people that believe that life begins at conception, and that the aborting of a fetus is therefore a form of infanticide.  These two positions are so far apart, that there doesn't appear to be much middle ground.  However, there actually exists a middle ground that for the most part, though it may not please everyone, does a commendable job of reducing a significant portion of the controversy.

 

That is to say, it makes logical sense to surmise that most women that actually get or desire to get an abortion, fervently wish that they had not gotten pregnant to begin with.  This thus means, that besides all the educational materials about how to prevent unintended pregnancies as well as the multitude of options that are available for females to preclude or to be in control of such; that it is important to have additional reliable options that are available for women, that are readily obtainable, convenient, accurate and of low cost, for those that have already had sex, but consciously recognize that they do not wish or to chance becoming pregnant.

 

Fortunately, there are two good options, of which one is the inserting of a copper intrauterine device (IUD) and the other being one of the many emergency contraceptive pills that are available, in which both of these options, are effective, even up to five days, after unprotected sex.  However, as might be expected, there are costs involved with each of these options, as well as logistics so involved.  That said, each of these options is highly reliable, so that, those women that wish to maintain full control of their body, have those avenues available.

 

This would so indicate, that birth control advocates should make it a point, in conjunction with social and/or governmental agencies, to see that copper IUD devices as well as emergency contraceptive pills are readily available, convenient, and of a low cost for all those that wish to avail themselves of such.  So too, it is absolutely vital that those that are most susceptible to suffering from an unintended pregnancy, be cognizant that there are very good options, after unprotected sex, that are available for them, in a convenient manner and of little or no cost.

 

The best way to effectively address this important issue, would be quite similar to other health issues of vital concern to this nation, which addresses such in a comprehensive and thorough manner, so that the upshot is that women of all backgrounds are well informed of their options in this matter, and consequently are able to avail themselves of those viable options because they are well knowledgeable of them, thereby reducing unintended pregnancies, which then reduces abortions.

 

In an era in which a woman's right to her own body and her own choice, is under assault in so many States, it is important to recognize that there is a silver lining, which is that women most definitely have good choices that will preclude the need for an abortion, by preventing an undesired pregnancy in the first place, and therefore more vigorous resources and logistics should be devoted to doing that very thing.

The disenfranchisement of the enfranchisement of the black man after the 15 Amendment by kevin murray

The 15th Amendment to the Constitution stipulates that "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude," of which this 15th Amendment was ratified in 1870, and therefore the upshot of this Amendment, was that black males, previously enslaved or not, now had the legal right to vote in democratic elections, and the immediate aftereffect of this legislation was that in some of the Southern States, blacks were duly elected to legislative and other offices.  However, regrettably, there was never going to be a time when the elite and powerful of the South, were going to countenance being ruled or policed by the black man, fairly elected or not, and in short order, those voting rights as Constitutionally provided to the black man, became, through hook or by crook, violence, and intimidation, effectively null and void.

 

This thus meant, for the South, in which States such as Mississippi, as reported by the jacksonfreepress.com, had approximately 55 percent of their population previously enslaved, and hence blacks thereupon became the majority race in Mississippi; as well as reported by Bowdoin.edu, in which the census of 1870, showed that 44.2% of the lower South, were blacks, that the black vote, now being effectively negated, meant that because the Constitution stipulated that its elected Congress, be proportionally represented by the aggregation of the total population of the United States, and then in proportion to the enumerated population of each individual State, within a construct in which no longer was the counting of slaves apportioned as three-fifths of a person, but that instead all blacks would therefore be counted each as a whole person; and therefore this signified the increase of the corresponding amount of representatives in the South, of which those representatives so elected to the House of Representatives, would not reflect the diversity of the South, but would solely reflect the white ruling class of the South, and by this, keep those that had formerly been enslaved to suffer the ill effects of not only State and regional power placed against them, but Federal power as well, or if not that, Federal power that had become eviscerated in regards to civil rights.

 

So then, despite Constitutional Amendments that were meant to give blacks a seat at the table, which they did indeed have for a very brief period of time during the reconstruction era, materially helped by the power and authority of Federal troops so situated in the South; what happened though, within a very short order, was that the power structure reverted to the Southern white elite, and blacks were subsequently in many respects reduced to slavery by another name.  So that in practice, States such as Mississippi which had but four seats in Congress in 1852, had by 1904, eight seats in Congress, in which each of those seats were occupied by white men.  So then, it can be said, though having lost the Civil War, the South, through the bastardization of the 15th Amendment and other Constitutional law, actually got stronger in its national legislative power, as well as more entrenched in its old ways in each of its respective Southern States.

Money, money, and more money by kevin murray

We live in a monetary credit community, in which billions of dollars are created, year by year, so as to help prime the gears of the wheels in order to keep the American economy humming and growing.  Those that run American's central banking consortium, the Federal Reserve, talk a very good game and try to give the impression to the susceptible public that the economic minutiae that they study and process, makes everything that they do, appear to be of sound basis and common sense. 

 

The bottom line is that when dollars are created, those dollars should most appropriately be utilized in constructive ways that help the American public and the economy, in whole.  At least, that should be the general theory, but the reality of the situation is that when monetary credit increases at a greater rate than what should be occurring or is necessary, then those monetary assets are ultimately going to be mal-invested, of which the primary source of such mal-investment is not to take that money and invest it into the infrastructure of America, which may not show any immediate return of that money in the sense of a traditional return on investment, or at least not directly; but rather to take the easy and greedy road, of simply investing those excess funds into the mania of the stock market casino, recognizing that speculating in that way, is very much a confidence game, of a belief, that the prices of stocks, ever rise, until they do not.

 

Again, monetary capital is required for businesses and economies to grow, but there is a world of difference between money being utilized to purchase goods, materials, infrastructure, labor, or research and development, that are productive for that business or country, as compared to money being "invested" into a corporation, via stock trading, in which, all that has really occurred is that one stockholder has traded shares for money, only to take that money and trade it once again for stock, in which the object of the exercise, is for the price of those underlying stocks to inexorably go up, even though fundamentally the business of that corporation represents less and less real relevance to the price of the underlying stock.

 

All of this money that should be utilized constructively to make this nation more vibrant and stronger, as well as to keep the people fully employed at a fair wage, is often misdirected into purely speculative measures, in which, that speculation is basically done on the spurious reasoning, that if the equities so being invested in are traded in a manner in which they always go up, than those speculators are ever getting richer.  To a certain degree this theory works, until such a time arrives, as it invariably does, when the confidence game of the stock market casino, loses its confidence, and those easy speculators, take the easy way out, by selling and no longer reciprocating such sales with buying, leading to the inevitable result from such easy speculation, which is the crash, and the higher those stock prices are and the longer such excess speculation has gone on, the bigger is that crash.

 

While it is true that in this modern era, countries can just manufacture money -- that money ultimately is worth only what is being materially manufactured, produced, and utilized; so that excess money that is mal-invested is the equivalency of money that is just being burned.

Overcoming the fear of death by kevin murray

Nearly everyone, and especially mothers, rightly celebrate the birth of a newborn as a seminal event of much importance and love.  On the other hand, death while sometimes welcomed and celebrated, is more often seen, especially in western societies, as quite tragic, because of the elimination of that person from this world, and therefore a typical source of much sorrow and regret. The thing is that for those that celebrate birth as a joyous moment, yet, that also believe that death is a tragedy, are representing an obvious inconsistency in their mindset, for because every birth in this world, means the inevitability of the death of that person, then the very birthing of a newborn should more properly be seen as a future tragedy and therefore such happiness for the former should also be tinged with sadness for the latter.

 

This thus means for those that believe solely in a material world, that each birth thereby necessitates a corresponding death and nothing beyond; have a belief that is both fatalistic as well as being rather bleak, for the construct so created, really represents a worldview that demonstrates in principle that life is wholly unfair and of no or little good purpose.  On the other hand, those that correctly surmise that birth and death are only tied to this material plane, and that in reality, each of us is an immortal being of spirit which actuates upon our physical lives, of which this earth in actuality represents a testing ground, then life on this plane, thereby seems to be both fair and of a good purpose.

 

Each of us, should want to make it our mission to know the whole truth, for those that have beliefs which are untrue, false, or mistaken are going to have a  much stronger inclination to fear things, such as death, that they need not overly fear, as well as to make decisions that are wrong; as opposed to all those that in knowing the truth of who and what they really are, are able to grasp the big picture and to correspondingly conduct themselves in such a manner so as to be a benefit to themselves as well as to mankind, in general.

 

The reason that fear is put into our being to begin with, is usually as a protection for us, so as to not unnecessarily harm or endanger ourselves, and from that perspective such is wise.  However, those that fear something that is inevitable, such as dying, need instead to understand what living is all about; and from that basis, they should correctly comprehend firstly that life and death are part of the cycle of life on earth, and further that since such is repeated again and again and again, that behind that cycle there must be a Master Source for all this.

 

Far too many people fear death, when what they should be far more cognizant of, is what they are doing proactively in their lives to make this world a better and more fulfilling place, for the body is ever mortal, but the spirit is transcendent and immortal; and those that have the attributes of God and have utilized such in this world and beyond become the very pillars of the palace of God, and those that have not attained or achieved such, must return again and again, till they are.

Learn how to boss your bad habits by kevin murray

People are creatures of habits, for a lot of reasons, of which, one of the most pertinent ones is that, habits in general, can make our lives more efficient, by allowing us to follow, for instance, a given pattern that is beneficial as well as being time effective for us.  However, habits can easily be divided into good habits, that is habits that are of benefit for us, and/or help us in our efficiency and effectiveness; as compared to habits that are bad habits, that clearly hinder us, and not only hurt our efficiency and effectiveness, but are harmful to our character.

 

One might think that anyone with a bad habit, such as substance abuse, a bad temper, eating disorders, and the like, would as a matter of course, simply get fed up with such, and would eliminate it forthrightly.  In point of fact, because of the nature of habits, simply eradicating a habit is something that is going to not only take concentration and willpower, but it often also needs self-examination, as to why it is that one does what they do, and therefore foundationally to understand what caused the undesired and unbeneficial habit to become part of our being.

 

While there is something to be said about people that use the strength of their willpower to not give into their habit, that is never going to be the best way to eliminate a bad habit, because willpower is something, that can ebb and flow, depending upon outside circumstances, our mindset, and our weaknesses on a given day, so that those that give up drink for a period of time through their sheer strength of mind, and nothing else, are quite susceptible to being caught unawares in the same maelstrom that they previously escaped from, should certain circumstances arise, leading them to get right back in to the temptation that has ensnared them again and again.

 

On the other hand, those that have the thoroughness of mind to get to the root of the problem, as to the nature of why they do what they do that is of a bad nature and of a bad habit, of which this is clearly harmful to them as well as being undesired; understand comprehensively that by doing so, that they can foundationally eliminate their bad habits and their bad inclinations from their life, by taking away the desire and the want to do that very thing.

 

Those that suffer from a bad habit, that they do not wish to own anymore, must make it their point to be the boss of that habit by consciously eliminating it as something that they no longer wish to have, and replace such with something else that is of higher merit and is beneficial to the person, instead.  While it is not easy to eradicate a bad habit, especially one of long standing; this can be accomplished, though, when that habit is thoroughly investigated and the roots of the desire for that habit have been pulled out of the ground that previously held it so firmly.  After all, it is our minds that forge the chains of those habits, and therefore it is our minds that can break us free, if only, we would have the wherewithal to draw the line in the sand, and to make our valiant stand.

When the government disobeys its own abiding principles by kevin murray

Any good country is supposed to be a country that lives in principle, by its faithful observance of its laws made from those good principles.  That is to say, this Union of States, recognizing the importance of having a strong and stable national government, took the initiative to have those representatives of those States meet together, so as to debate and to discuss and to come to a consensus so as to therefore create good governance, by the issuance and subsequent ratification of that Constitution.  Clearly, the United States has a well written Constitution, with important Amendments to that Constitution, of principles that are quite favorable for the creation as well as the sustainability of a country that is of the people, by the people, and for the people.  That is to say, governments are created by and for representatives of the people, as a compact between those people of that country, of which the government so instituted derives its just powers exclusively from the consent of those so governed.

 

So then, if that government would only follow truly the dictates of that Constitution, then that country would represent in actuality the abiding principles of that Constitution.  In point of fact, in many respects, this government and its interpretation of the laws so propagated, have demonstrated again and again, that the laws so made, are not stable or consistent, but are instead often as applied --arbitrary, contradictory, and just plain wrong.  This thus means that laws that should be consistent and equally applied to all equally, are the very opposite of such consistency, and are often biased, unfair, discriminatory, and even inimical to the Constitution, itself.

 

This signifies that a country that does not conform to its own abiding principles as per its Constitutional law, is a country that has clearly lost its moral compass, and such can therefore only create a construct of confusion, disappointment, hypocrisy, and dissent.  All those that cry for justice, must understand, that when a country does not adhere to its own Constitutional principles, then that country cannot now, nor will it ever be able to actually have justice in its land.

 

Consequently, a country that does not live up to its founding principles and has no interest in doing so, has devolved into a country in which the citizens of that nation are not going to respect the law as applied, for the law is not worthy of their respect, for when that government at the highest legislative, judicial, and executive levels, essentially treats the law as something that is ever changeable, depending upon the powers to be and the whip that they so use, than the law effectively is not stable or legitimate, and is of little merit.

 

A legitimate government of the people, must not be a power above and beyond the people, but must represent the people, and further to the point, that government must live within the abiding principles of their founding law, that is, their Constitution.  To the extent that this is done, the government of that country has legitimacy, and to the extent that this is not done, such a government as that, has lost its way, and is therefore a counterfeit government by virtue of its failure to adhere to and to abide to its Constitution and its people.

Equality and inequality by kevin murray

The seminal document that founded this great nation, states forthrightly “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,” and this Declaration of Independence, was signed by fifty-six of the most esteemed and influential men, from each of the thirteen colonies, and further that these same men pledged their lives, their fortunes, as well as their sacred honor upon the words so disseminated.

 

These words quite clearly meant that these men truly believed that each of us has therefore been equally created.  So then, it could be questioned and should be questioned, as to how it is that these honorable men and all those that have followed them, could in any way, form, or function, believe thereafter that a legitimate government by the people, for the people, and of the people could be a government that would ever sanction a construct in which some of those very same men, or subsequent generations of those men, would somehow have devolved into believing that we are created unequally.

 

This would then signify, that the only possible way that this country can remain true to its own Declaration of Independence is to have a country in which the laws, justice, and fairness is applied in such a manner that reflects that each one of us, has been created equally by God, and therefore all those that treat mankind as being something other than equal, are effectively traitors to that Declaration of Independence, and further have lost their place as moral agents of good.

 

So then, in every area in which the application of law, justice, and fairness does not truly reflect that equality, such laws are effectively nullified, and where there has been and continues to be systemic injustice and inequality, such needs in order to be made right, be rectified, forthrightly. 

 

This would so indicate that when any nation turns its back on the very cornerstone of the foundation of that nation, of which that cornerstone is morally correct, then such a nation as that is surely not blessed by God, for it is not in adherence with the moral law of God.  This would indicate that the United States very first obligation that supersedes all else, is to support and to propagate its appropriate mission, above all things.

 

It cannot be emphasized enough, that when mankind is intelligent enough and perceptive enough to recognize that our Creator has created all of His children equally, that it therefore follows that our sacred obligation is to see that this is upheld within the government so constituted amongst mankind.  While one can applaud words that are moral truths and that are pledged to, it is not enough to know those words, or have listened to those words, but those words in order to have any positive and lasting effect amongst mankind, must be lived up to. 

 

It is in the living and our application thereof, that we do show who and what we truly are, for those that speak of equality but live by the sword of inequality, are provocateurs of great ill winds, that sustained long enough will surely take down the edifice of all that is good and leave nothing but desolation and ruin, from its horrible destruction.

Violence begets violence by kevin murray

America is a violent society, and as the leading western nation in virtually any metric of merit, the violence in America makes it an outlier in comparison to virtually every other western nation.  One might think that for the country that claims to have been blessed by God, and to be the epitome of both freedom and opportunity that the United States would be embarrassed and disturbed of this inconvenient reality infringing upon the American dream, but based on the fact, that such violence does not appear to be subsiding, it must not be.

 

In point of fact, in order to successfully resolve such violence, some things must fundamentally change within America.  First, would be the recognition that equality matters in every conceivable way, of which this signifies that equality of opportunity, equality of education, equality of income, and equality of justice, are absolutely germane to the amount of violence in any nation.  That is to say, that the lack of equality, in which those suffering from that lack, intuitively recognize the unfairness of such, breeds frustration, and from that frustration all sorts of ills come forth, of which one of those ills so expressed, is violence in any of its myriad forms.  Secondly, families and communities that are violent in their behavior, and subsequently in their way of dealing with problems, frustrations, and setbacks are going to create more violence, because people in general, replicate in their own manner, the world as they see reflected in front of them.

 

Solutions to these problems necessitate thorough resolve, as opposed to what is currently occurring, in which well placed privileged people cry the loudest for law and order, and in return, receive more law and order especially upon those communities and people that are engaging in uncivil behavior, of which this does not fundamentally resolve systemic problems, no matter the copious amounts of people so arrested and incarcerated, because sanctioned state actions that are violent, discriminatory, and predatory in its own way, merely teaches the lesson that such is effective for the awesome power so displayed; and so then, the people within that community will respond utilizing their version of the same.

 

Additionally, those that grow up within conditions of a family, in which there is much strife and discord, along with strong domestic violence, are prone to suffer not only the ill effects of being violently abused by their family, but are going to take that suffering so received and with their additional grievances that life is unfair and unjust, become, rather logically and regrettably, violent themselves.  So that, it can be said, that violence begets violence.

 

The only successful way out of the continuum of more and more violence, is to mitigate and to ameliorate the conditions that breed such violence, and the sooner that this is addressed in societies as well as in the lives of all people, the sooner such will be markedly improved.  The violence in America is a true reflection that something is fundamentally unhinged in America, and what is unhinged is the fact that oppression, unfairness, and exploitation, are the fuel that stokes the fires of violence, and those caught in that maelstrom, act violently, mainly because this reflects the violence that permeates their own lives, and enthralls them.

 

Taxation and standing armies by kevin murray

The United States has the world's largest standing army, or military complex, which has its tentacles and its reach felt throughout the entire world.  While there may indeed be benefits for being the world's most powerful military, it must be recognized that not only is the world, filled with just over 7.5 billion people, as well as there being approximately 200 different nations in this world, but that also there are wholesale differences between many of those peoples as well as those nations, of which, most of those differences do not and does not directly impact the United States, proper.

 

That is to say, the viewpoint of other people as well as other nations does not agree in many respects, with the United States, but in the scheme of things, other nations and other peoples are fundamentally mainly concern about their own domestic issues as well as having a meaningful concern about their neighbors contiguous to their borders, so then, for the most part, this means that the United States, does not have a real necessity to concern themselves militarily with most other nations; yet it does.

 

It would be one thing, if the military complex of the United States, somehow didn't cost the American taxpayers a dime, but, in fact, that military complex has an immense budget, as reported by usgovernmentspending.com, of which for fiscal year 2019, that amount came to a total of $940 billion, representing the monies so being spent on the Military spending, Veterans, and Foreign Aid.   Further to the point, standing armies in order to justify their existence, must make it their point, to flex their muscles, each and every year, so as to indicate to the American population not only how dangerous that the world at large so appears, but that the threats, real or imagined, so discovered, must be and only can be dealt with effectively by that military complex.  So then, the upshot of such a viewpoint is that the defense spending of America increases year by year, even though America has not had a Congressional declared war since World War II.

 

So too, because of the America's defense budget as well as other national expenditures of all types, the fiscal responsibility of this country to balance its own national budget, has fallen completely to the wayside.  So that, the present day citizens of this nation, are not being taxed at the rate so necessary to pay for this defense as well as other national commitments, because this government runs instead, massive deficits, of which the financial burden of such are thereupon placed upon the backs of future generations.

 

Because America refuses to get its fiscal house in order, and because therefore the taxpaying public does not suffer the real-time impact of what their taxation would have to be, in order to balance a budget that promises both guns and butter, the howling that would be expected from an overburdened and overtaxed public is not only not heard, but the real impact as well as the real sacrifice necessitated is not ever felt by that public, so that the end result is a nation that is enthralled to the military complex, and led by a government that hoodwinks the public about the national costs of this fiscal irresponsibility. Such a government has not the courage to place the onerous taxes so necessary on its people to balance its fiscal budget, because the rich won't pay for it, the poor don't have it, and the middle class can't alone carry all that weight.

Wealth and paper money by kevin murray

We live in an age in which our wealth is typically ascertained by the value of our assets in the form of dollars or whatever the coin of the realm is of that particular nation.   Many people, though, do make the fundamental mistake of seeing dollars in and of themselves as a form of wealth, whereas dollars should more properly be seen as a medium of exchange.  That is to say, that for the most part, dollars are ideally utilized and have been created as a way to monetize assets, goods, labor, and just about anything that can be traded so that both sides to a trade can easily make the exchange thereby using a medium which is both universal as well as having what is considered to be, stability of value.

 

So then, in modern times, we use dollars or their electronic version of as our genre of monetized assets.  So too, in previous civilizations, money has been represented by shells, or whatever else people found to be suitable, or through physical coins of the realm, or through tradable receipts issued by institutions that behaved as banks of their day, and so on and so forth,.  Yet, before any of this occurred, there was a time, when banking institutions or their equivalencies, or coins, didn't really exist, so that in order for one party to trade with another, some sort of bartering was done, perhaps through the exchange of animals or agricultural products or perhaps something else of value, or even of symbolic representation of value.

 

In any event, even without money, or some coin of the realm, societies were clearly separated between those that had and those that had not, and that separation was essentially along the lines of what a given party actually owned.  That is to say, people's wealth, and societal wealth, was based upon the property so owned by those people, such as their land, their home, their possessions, and so on and so forth.  So that, in essence, wealth back in the days before money, was displayed by the actual ownership of goods and other material possessions that a given person had or did not have. 

 

This meant, that the way that one generation of wealth passed on that wealth to the next generation, was by the gifting of their land, or their animals, or their possessions to the next generation; because these very things represented and were, in essence, wealth, and not a symbol of wealth, such as in a dollar bill, but the wealth of something real and tangible, and often of relevant use in the current time and age.

 

It could then be said, that those that have a substantial amount of wealth in the form of paper or electronic money, should always be a bit wary of that considered version of wealth, for if such a time should come in which for whatever reason, that paper money is devalued substantially over a very short order of time, and done so in a manner that is wholly unexpected, one might find that owning paper money is not now, nor ever really has been the same as owning something that is tangible, real, and has intrinsic worth, in and of itself.

Slavery, freedom, and land by kevin murray

The end result of the Civil war was the eradication of the insidious institution of slavery, and thereby the freeing of those previously enslaved, that were also thereupon granted per the highest law of this land, citizenship, equal protection of the laws, as well as the right to vote.  All of this, sounds quite good on paper, but good laws that are not enforced are hardly good laws at all.  Additionally, in 1865, most slaves were not only illiterate, but were rather rural in the substance of their labor, they also owned no property, so that the freeing of 3.5 million peoples, that own no land and had no property was not in and of itself, going to provide a fair opportunity for those previously enslaved to become self-supporting and truly viable as well as liberated members of society.

 

In an era in which the southern rebellion had been put down, and in which, the vast majority of former slaves were physically located within those rebellious States, all this should have been recognized as being the proper and the best time for the Federal government to take proactive measures to provide to these illiterate and agrarian based former slaves, with the land, seeds, and tools, so as to make these people, self-sufficient and to secure their freedom and prosperity.

 

While it is true that the Federal government did provide some material aid to those previously enslaved, in conjunction with and alongside of religious organizations, and volunteers, that helped to educate former slaves as well as to enforce and to protect Constitutional law within those States, it was not enough overall to provide meaningful change for the vast majority of those previously enslaved.  That is to say, for the most part, those of the powerful planter class of the south that had rebelled against this Union of States, that produced untold misery and bloodshed upon the peoples of the same country, were able to upon the end of hostilities and the peace so made, go back to their lands, in most cases, with full rights to such, as opposed to their lands being rightly confiscated and being provided to those without land, including poor landless southern whites, as well as previously enslaved and landless blacks.

 

So that, while blacks were now citizens, with, in theory, equal protection of and access to judicial law, as well as the enfranchisement of the vote, it did not take long for the plantation ruling class of the south to assert themselves in such a manner, that things were about the same as they were during the institution of slavery, with the exception that rather than having and owning slaves, those that work the land for that plantation ruling class, were now designated as sharecroppers instead. 

 

All of this really meant, that freedom, without the accouterments of what people actually need to be truly free, as represented by adequate education, the fair compensation of the fruits of one's labor, as well as the means for the ownership of land, meant that those that had been enslaved were in effect, free on paper, but still oppressed and subjugated, in actuality.

The reason behind stock market crashes by kevin murray

All stock markets, suffer from the syndrome of booms and busts, of which, for those on the receiving end of the busts, one can find this to be rather devastating to not only their savings, but to their lifestyle or even to life, itself.  As much as governments try to control or to smooth out economic cycles, the reality is that because the stock market is a marketplace in which investors essentially vote with their dollars, this thus means that for every single second of every minute of every day that the market is open for business, such controls are never going to be robust enough, to effectively overcome the sentiment so expressed by those investors.

 

In America, as charted by trendingeconomics.com, the total market capitalization of listed companies in the United States in 2007, was about $20 trillion, of which during the crash of 2008, this dropped to under $12 trillion in 2008, and as of 2017, stood at an astonishing $32.1 trillion. Not only does this clearly show that the total market capitalization is rather volatile, but it also demonstrates quite clearly that the stock market capitalization of this country does not correlate well with America's actual GDP growth, in which from 2008-2017, in not a single year, did the GDP even reach 3% per annum, and in fact, averaged only about 1.5% per annum during that period, yet the market capitalization of the stock market, increased at a rate far exceeding the actual goods and services so produced.

 

Quite obviously, this would so indicate, that the stock market has a mind of its own, of which, those investing in that market, by their buying and by their selling, determine the value of these publically traded companies.  This means, by implication that the "worth" of these publically traded companies are determined not so much by their sales or earnings, but in actuality by the bid price and the ask  price of those so trading in those securities.  This also indicates, that in a stock market in which each party to a trade, that is the buyer and the seller, have made a deal to trade for a certain stock price, that each side, believes that the deal is fair, or else the deal would not have been done at that price point.  So then, it would seem that the stock market takes into account, all actionable information and therefore is ever efficient, but this is belied by those booms that go bust, as well as by those busts that become booms.

 

The reason that the stock market crashes, even in mature markets such as in the United States, which has all sorts of regulations, controls, and even circuit breakers to stop all trading during steep drops, is that the transactions between a given buyer and a given seller are ultimately in the hands of those buyers and sellers.  Further to the point, in order for any market to continue to climb up, this is going to be dependent upon new money coming in, in order to therefore push those prices up, for without that new money, the fuel that propels the stock market, will dissipate, because all those that are already in the market, are already at a certain equilibrium. This, thus means, that markets crash, when they aren't any new investors, in addition to a significant amount of the current investors deciding that they just want out, and those selling are thereby willing to leave some money on the table, to get out, in their flight to safety or sanity, or both.

Violent felonies that don't involve violence by kevin murray

The very first thing about United States jurisprudence is that the law as applied is often subject to all sorts of permutations that don't make a lot of logical sense, and certainly the law as currently utilized is absolutely no deterrent to certain crimes, because the very people perpetrating such crimes, are typically clueless of the consequences and costs of such crimes, and in reality don't become cognizant of the extent of the punishment that they are susceptible to, until the charges are made by the prosecution.

 

As for the law, and specifically when it comes to violent crimes, most laypeople, would consider that for a person to be convicted of a violent felony that the crime would have to be both violent as well as also being categorized as a felony.  So that, most people would readily agree that murder, aggravated assault and battery of a high nature, and kidnapping, would all be rightly classified as being a violent felony.  However, it must be said, that some criminals are not successful at what they are attempting to do, so that attempted murder, in which the victim is not physically hurt, is still considered to be a violent felony because the perpetrator was attempting to murder the other person. So then, we find that in many cases crimes that are classified as a violent felony, still are in force, even when the perpetrator isn’t successful in carrying out their actions, solely because the perpetrator was trying to commit a crime categorized as a violent felony.

 

Additionally, the same type of crime can be classified differently in different States, along with the fact that some crimes are categorized as violent felonies, which don't seem to have an element of violence attached to them.  For instance, drug trafficking of methamphetamine is considered to be in some States a violent felony, even if the other party is a willing buyer of that methamphetamine.  So too, arson is considered a violent felony, even when the violence so perpetuated is upon an abandoned home or building.  Additionally, aggravated voyeurism is a violent felony, even though there is no physical contact between the perpetrator and the victim

 

The problem with violent felonies, as currently adjudicated, is that higher courts have ruled that a violent felony can exist, when someone threatens another, or in which a criminal action contains the element of physical force.  This so signifies, that because most felonies involve the use of some sort of degree of physical force, as in the taking of something from another, such then would signify that a person having their iPhone pick-pocketed from them, could thereby be interpreted as they having suffered from a violent felony.

 

The reason that it matters whether a crime is considered to be violent or not, is that the punishment for violent felonies is almost always considerably more than the penalty for the same type of crime but without the designation or classification of being violent.  So that, in New York, for instance, a 'C' or a 'D' violent felony, necessitates mandatory incarceration; whereas a 'C' or a 'D' for a non-violent felony, has the option of the perpetrator being sentenced to no jail or just probation.  All of this basically means, that violent felonies that don't involve violence but are prosecuted as violent felonies, are laws that have been molded into punishing people more than what it is really fair, and clearly is done so in a manner that is both arbitrary as well as unjust.

The fear of annihilation by kevin murray

Because we live in a material world, many of us believe wholly in that world, and specifically believe that who and what we really are, must correctly be represented by their physical body as well as by their mind.  This thus means for those of that mindset that we all live in a very fatalistic place, for none that are born here are ever able to escape the law that those that are birthed into this world, must at some point, die; some sooner and some later.

 

Further to the point, if we only are physical beings, just as animals are physical creatures, then the death of a human being or of an animal must therefore be the annihilation of that person or animal, forever.  This is something that quite obviously is rather foreboding and presupposes the question, that should be investigated, which is whether or not we should believe in the construct that we are nothing but physical beings, for if we are not, physical death is not only unavoidable, but it is also something to be rightly feared, for in a world such as that, death represents the annihilation of our body as well as of our mind.

 

On the other hand, it must be understood that it is not conceivable that our origin came from nothing, for out of nothing comes forth nothing -- for nothing can never create something, for this is a logical fallacy to think so.  This thus means that our origin never began from nothing; that is to say, before we were formed in our mother's womb, we must have for a certainty, already existed in some other form and therefore our birth into this material world, represents in actuality the opportunity to live and to die in this world, so as to experience the myriad aspects of this world, and to actively engage in our relationship with others that are here alongside of us.

 

This also signifies that once we are aware that we are not just our physical bodies and not just our mind, but rather we are something beyond such, usually represented by the acknowledgment that we have an immortal soul, of which, that soul is not subject to the slings and arrows of time and finiteness; if becomes much easier to see this world as well as our life as something to be lived in a manner in which we are cognizant that our true reality is limitless, rather than limited.

 

As sad as physical death may be, whether unexpected, unwelcomed or not, it is alas, the nature of life on this earth; in which, even those that live to a very long age, must at sometime, succumb to the inevitably that each physical body only has a finite amount of years, before such a body will have worn itself out and thereby expires.  This means that it is incumbent upon each one of us to recognize that we are housed within a physical body, subject to time and limitations as well as the laws of this planet, all in reality, to truly test our mettle of who and what we actually represent, and that those that do well and are true to the Highest Law, see physical death not as annihilation, but rather as the liberation from the restricting prison of this dimension.

Recognizing that each of us gets older day by day by kevin murray

For most people, when they are very young, a significant part of their personality wants to be older, for they see older people, though not really old people, as having more freedom and of being in control of their lives.  Later on, as they get closer to adult age, they may yearn deeply to be 18, or in America, in many cases, to be 21, so that they are truly their own person, an adult, and they eagerly embrace such.

 

At some point, though, many adults begin to see time as being not so much their friend, but rather their enemy; perhaps, because they have not achieved as much as they would have liked, or perhaps because their physical looks or strength have begun to fade or that they perceive that they are fading, or perhaps because they really love their life as it is, right now, and do not want to lose what they already possess, to the unfairness of old age and mortality; yet, they will.

 

While, it's true that a significant amount of adults spend inordinate amounts of money on cosmetic surgeries of all types, or diets, or makeup, or this or that, all in the somewhat vain hope that this, somehow, will push time back, most of these adults in their more honest moments, recognize that while taking care of one's health, and one's physical body and one's looks has its place, it is not possible for somebody that is middle aged or older, to look as they did when they were just young adults.

 

All of this basically means, that time is very real, and further that time always and inexorably marches forward, so that, it would probably be more productive as well as being more sensible to recognize that life has its cycles, and that within that cycle, the inevitably of growing old and eventually dying, are part and parcel of what life really represents.  This thus means that rather than pretending or trying to fool ourselves that our bodies are immortal, it is important to consciously recognize, what we intuitively know, that they are mortal, and that our time upon this earth is finite.  Therefore it would logically follow that if more people were in tune with the fact that their life goes through stages of which the final stage is the death of that body, they would probably be more cognizant that their time should be utilized in a manner in which what they say or do, is in accordance to being of benefit for themselves as well as for others.

 

After all, for most people to establish a good career as well as to establish a good family, such usually necessitates having a plan, worthwhile goals, and the wherewithal to put forth the effort to accomplish these specific things.  This signifies that in knowing that our time here is limited, as well as recognizing that the stages of our lives are bounded within that time, it behooves us to therefore to be productive and positive in all that we do and accomplished; for all the errors, wrongs, and mistakes that we make, aren't necessarily going to be able to be successfully rectified, because time itself cannot be erased, but instead must be dealt with as it is.  So it can be said that in the knowing of the end, from our beginning, our lives will be more meaningful, it we never lose sight of that fact, and thereby live our lives accordingly.

Abject poverty is the precursor to crime by kevin murray

The United States is a highly unequal society, in which as reported by the Institute for Policy Studies, the three richest Americans collectively have more wealth than the bottom 50% of the population, which represents a total of 160 million people.  This sort of disparity of such a huge amount indicates clearly that too few have too much, at the expense of too many, having too little.  Not too surprisingly, in a country that is inundated with advertisements of all types and in all media forms, as well as having ingrained upon its nation's psyche, the importance of keeping up with the Joneses, such inequality breeds great discontent.

 

So then, it logically follows that all those that live in impoverished conditions, without hope, and without opportunity, are going to have a much stronger inclination towards considering the performing of and the doing of things which are lawless, in order to somehow make ends meet; in the hopes thereof of thereby obtaining some sort of piece of the American dream which has clearly passed them by; for they having been dismissed by mainstream society as irrelevant and of no consequence, have little or nothing to lose of value.

 

In point of fact, when we are told that idle hands are the devil's tools, it must be added that idle hands in enclaves of society in which those people that congregate there, widely suffer from being ill-educated, impoverished, and without promise, than this is quite obviously going to breed its own trouble, of which some of that trouble is going to birth crime.  On the other hand, when any society takes it upon itself that through progressive governmental programs, as well as through the involvement of motivated organizations of all stripes, to tackle the systemic problems of poverty in a manner so as to make real and lasting change, thereby providing hope and belief to those previously without much of either, this will reduce both trouble as well as crime.

 

Societies such as the United States, which are grossly and sickly unequal, yet, have in aggregate great amounts of monetary capital as well as the required infrastructure to provide a sound basis for a good life for all of its citizens; essentially have the necessary ingredients to eradicate poverty from its shores, if it would only set its mind and subsequently prioritize itself on doing exactly that.  In truth, for the most part, those that have nothing, are not typically looking for just a handout; but instead are really seeking to be provided a helping hand so as to have the basis of a solid foundation that will thereby permit them to succeed in such a way that they will make their own decent life through their invigorated efforts.

 

The poverty that exists in America represents failure, of which from that failure, crimes and bad behavior are the end products.  All those that wish to eliminate or to reduce crime considerably, should recognize that a far more effective way to do so, is to be proactive as compared to being reactive, and thereby should support the governmental taking through taxation and the fair application of law from the very, very rich, while, in return the giving of opportunity and of fairness to the very, very poor, which will make for a healthier society, of far less poverty, and of far less crime.