What we owe those that were brought here in chains

The slaves that came upon the shores of America did not arrive here in chains, because of wars that America had with those other countries, but rather those that became enslaved were systematically taken from their native land and compelled to come to this country in a condition of chattel slavery.  Those that bought these human beings, treated such as chattel property, and even the law of the land in America during its period of legal slavery, provided little or no rights whatsoever, to those that were enslaved.

While it is true that those that were formerly enslaved are now free, and that even the laws of this great land, now provide to all, at least on paper, the same vested powers for all of its citizens, regardless of sex, race, or creed; the overall net result clearly demonstrates that the overwhelming amount of wealth and justice of this nation, favors those that were of the same race as the slaveholders, at the expense of those that are of the race, that were enslaved.

In a nation, that has aggregate wealth that has never been exceeded by any other empire in the history of the world, this country and its people owe to those that were violently taken from their country of origin, something of real merit in return.  Additionally, all those that were forcefully taken to this country in which their heritage in America was slavery, should be entitled to have a seat at the table of justice, opportunity, and hope.  This thus means, that this country owes all those that have a preponderance of proof that their forbearers were enslaved in this country, something tangible, of which that something, should reflect that value in present day dollars.

For instance, as reported on measuringworth.com, the estimated value of a typical antebellum slave's services in 2016 dollars would be $92,000.  It so then follows, that each person that has a bloodline legacy of slavery in this country, is fairly entitled to be compensated by this national government, to $92,000, and that bonds issued by that amount of money, should be rightly available for those people, when they become of age, without exception to their present state of employment, education, or similar.

In a nation that spends hundreds of billions upon hundreds of billions of dollars, on its war department, such a nation as that, can surely afford to take care of its own people, first.  Further to the point, as reported by stateofworkingamerica.org, "In 2010, the median wealth, or net worth, for black families was $4,900, compared to median wealth for whites of $97,000."  This is proof positive that in order for black families to catch up to those of the race that enslaved them, that the most positive action that will truly allow blacks that have suffered from a heritage of chattel slavery, to get what they so richly deserve for being an integral part of the building of this great nation, is monetary compensation.

After all, it is never too late to do the right thing.  Further, there was never a time when slavery was necessary in America, yet, slavery was part and parcel of America, and its aftermath is still felt here, today.  Those that have suffered so long have suffered enough, and it's high time to pay what needs to be paid, so that justice will finally be served.

War should necessitate increased taxation, curfews, and rationing

The United States has been at war for virtually the entire 21st century, and has continued to be at war with the inchoate "war on terror", which encompasses countries such as Afghanistan.  So too, the United States has recently been at war or is still at war with elements or the countries of Niger, Iraq, Somalia, Syria, and Yemen.  Further, the defense budget of fiscal year 2019 for America is $693 billion, proof positive that the United States is clearly geared up for war, ad infinitum.

In all of this war, strangely the United States demands no real sacrifice of its civilian population which doesn’t seem fair to our men and women in uniform that are sacrificing their lives, limbs, and minds to our overseas wars.  This necessitates that in order for Americans to feel the impact of these wars and thereby to make war more tangible to the civilian population of this country, that taxes, curfews, and rationing must be enacted, posthaste, in order for Americans to begin to comprehend that war really is brutal, nasty, and savage.

The first step to waking up the civilian population of America is to implement onto all taxpayers, be they corporations or individuals, a wartime premium tax.  The best structure for that tax is to make it progressive, with a very steep curve at the end, so that the most profitable corporations and individuals would therefore pay their fair share in support of their nation with their dollars.  It is well to remember that, during World War II the top rate for individual tax returns was 94%, and it so follows that this rate should be applied immediately, for the richest of the rich, and should remain in effect as long as this country is at war.  Further, all large corporations of a certain size, should be subject to an extra 15% federal income tax rate, and in addition, all those corporations, that currently circumvent United States taxation laws, by parking their earnings overseas, should pay an annual 20% surcharge for doing so, based on the net amount of monies so held, overseas.

Additionally, rationing of oil, food, clothing, coal, and various other consumer goods must be implemented, with governmental rationing programs put into place, affecting each and every member of this great nation.  After all, most of the wars that America insists upon involving itself in, are directly or indirectly because of oil, so that, Americans must be restricted in the amount of gasoline and oil so used, in all products, in which, the goal of such restriction would be to reduce the consumption of oil products by a meaningful percentage, such as 20%.  Further, it isn't fair that Americans continue to eat and shop as if there isn't war(s) going on, and rationing cards must be issued to thereby restrict the purchase of certain goods in order to demonstrate constraint and some degree of discipline so as to properly align the nation's psyche with the gravity of war.  Also, a general curfew should be put into effect, precluding nightclubs and other businesses catering to drinking and carousing, to forestall such, until such a time as war has been ended, and America is victorious.

In all of this, Americans should be ever grateful, for their sacrifices though perhaps inconvenient are for the better good of their nation, and in specific support of the war effort, at large.  For, how is it possible for Americans to eat, drink, and be merry, when their fellow Americans overseas, are being cut to pieces, by our enemies?  After all, a house divided will not stand, and a nation at war, needs its home front to reflect their patriotic fervor by their communal sacrifice for that greater good.

All employees earning less than a living wage should be paid weekly

In the United States the standard for paying one's employees, is not mandated by Federal law, but is left up to State law, though incredibly there are a few States, that don’t even mandate how often an employee must be paid, whatsoever.  In most cases, employees are paid weekly, bi-weekly, semi-monthly, or monthly, of which, quite obviously few employees would ever prefer to be paid just monthly, and many employees would prefer the frequency of getting paid weekly.  We read in Holy Scripture, "… The wages of a hired servant shall not remain with you all night until the morning" (Leviticus 19: 13), signifying that employees of that day and age, received their wages upon the completion of their work, each and every day.

No doubt, never has it been easier to create, process, and to issue paychecks to employees than it is today, in which, in many cases, a lot of employees no longer receive a physical paycheck but instead have their funds deposited directly into their banking account or even onto their smart phone.  So that, changing the frequency of the pay period for employees is hardly a daunting task, which is quite relevant, since as reported by forbes.com, an incredible "78% of workers live paycheck to paycheck."  This so signifies that employees that are struggling, which typically includes those that are making less than a living wage, should at a minimum, be paid weekly, and in fact, one could make a strong argument, that rather than their wages always being in arrears, that they should be prepaid each week, for their anticipated hours of that week to be labored.  After all, when employees are paid their wages, they are essentially being paid for work done earlier in the month, or earlier in the semi-monthly pay period, or earlier in the bi-weekly pay period, or earlier in the weekly pay period, so that, in short, employees are giving to their employers, an interest-free loan which is being involuntarily provided from each one of them in aggregate.  It hardly seems fair for employers to do such, for many an employer has gone belly-up or disappeared, with the employee wages in their hands, making the employees suffer for it.  In point of fact, paying employees for a day's work, at the end of the workday, is about as fair as can be and there isn't any valid reason why employers should be able to hold onto their employee's wages for up to a month.

Basically, employees should receive their wages in a timely and current manner, and those employees that are making less than a living wage, obviously have a real need to get their hands onto the money that they have rightly earned, sooner as compared to later, of which, a weekly paycheck would permit these employees a better means to take care of their bills and creditors of all sorts, rather than pay periods of an even lengthier period of time.  After all, if employers really valued their employees, they would make it their point to do more to accommodate them and thereby to pay them more frequently, for the money that their employees have earned, is theirs, and those that have earned that money have a right to it, which should never involve waiting periods of more than one week.

The Facebook minimum age must be raised to 21

At the current time, the minimum age for an account to be opened on Facebook is 13, which is an absurdly ridiculous and dangerous low age for someone so young to be on what purports to be a social media site, but is in actuality a devastatingly effective social surveillance site.  Additionally, Facebook does not in any meaningful way, even attempt to or is it ever legally held responsible for verifying the age that users claim that they are, signifying that people even younger than 13, can sign up for Facebook, as well as people that are adults can take on the guise of being far younger or even a different sex than they actually are.  This signifies that Facebook accounts are not only not always on the up and up, but that young people that are still quite credulous and vulnerable in many ways are susceptible to dealing with people that are adult predators or ne'er-do-wells as well as exploiters of all types and degrees.

The problems with Facebook are manifold of which the most fundamental problem is the fact that Facebook makes the vast majority of its money through digital advertising, and advertisers deeply desire to know their customer base well, and when they are able to access detailed pertinent information about a given individual, or a given class of individuals, they thus know that their ads will be far more effective.   This thus means that someone as young as 13, is an incredibly desirable target of digital advertisers, because they then have the means to mold such a consumer into their products that these advertisers solicit, of which Facebook is the enabler of this advertiser exploitation of Facebook users.

The United States has deemed it necessary to raise the drinking age nationwide to 21, as well as many of its States have subsequently raised the age to utilize tobacco to 21; in addition, to the minimum age to utilize marijuana is also 21, as well as to gamble in casinos is set at 21.  The reason that this is so is for the protection of young adults, who often can be irresponsible, and therefore these mandated age laws were passed for the better good of our youth.  To therefore believe that children at the age of 13, are somehow cognizant of all the dangers of social media posting as well as being completely knowledgeable about how much of their personal information is actually being sold to outside agencies, is unfathomable; therefore, for the protection of these children, as well as for young adults, Facebook should be mandated by law, to raise its minimum age to access such to 21, immediately.

For all those that believe, that teenagers or young adults could not survive without Facebook, recognize that it is Facebook that has created this dilemma, by deliberately constructing a system that purports to be a social media site, but is in actuality a dangerous and menacing social surveillance site, that specifically puts teenagers and young adults in harm's way; because Facebook analytically analyzes and accumulates and thereupon sells their users' information for outright exploitation for the buyers of such; as well as also creating a construct in which teenagers and young adults can more easily be tracked, stalked, and harmed, all so that the purveyors of Facebook can make their money at the expense of their constituents, that blithely believe that they are on a site that will make the world a more open and connected one, but reality is that Facebook has made them into sheep so as to shear them.

There shall be no kings of any kind in America!

Senator John Sherman of Ohio, stated, “If we will not endure a king as a political power we should not endure a king over the production, transportation, and sale of any of the necessaries of life."  In furtherance of this, the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was passed into law.  The impact of the Sherman Antitrust Act was to preclude monopolies of any sort, and in particular to preclude not only monopolies but conspiracies that would restrain trade and commerce by virtue of any market segment being dominated by any consortium of companies colliding together, or monopolistic in their form.

Incredibly, this law was put into effect, nearly 130 years ago, indicating that businesses even back then, clearly recognized that more profit and more control of trade and commerce would be in their hands if they had either monopoly control of such business to begin with, or by working in collision with other corporations, they could in effect, perform together as a monopoly and reap the immense benefits, thereof.  The upshot, is that any segment of the business world effectively controlled by the very few, in which the citizens of this nation would be virtually compelled to do business with directly or indirectly, would by that lack of competition and viable alternatives, be able to extract more money from the populace, and therefore to enrich themselves at the expense of the public.

In today's world, never have so few had so much, signifying without even taking a cursory glance at the business world that the Sherman Antitrust Act is essentially null and void; and therefore the public at large are the losers, and demonstrating clearly that this country effectively is neither egalitarian nor fair.  To make matters worse, the government, which in theory is of, for, and by the people, and hence is the last bastion to both protect as well as to augment benefits for the people, is for all intents and purposes working hand-in-glove with the largest corporate powers that the world has ever seen, to the detriment of the people.

In virtually any industry of note in America, today, the amount of competition is often minimal, in which there are, at best, a few corporate players at the very top that control well over 50 percent of the market share, and hence fundamentally have pricing and profit control of those markets.  Further to the point, this government, seems to consistently rubberstamp the buying up of competitors and smaller innovators, by those behemoth corporations, so that these corporations are able to successfully year-by-year not only consolidate their power but to thereby increase it and to remain, quite significant.

All of this really signifies, that in a country that has no king that the American citizens of this nation, are effectively paying tribute day-by-day to those corporate kings that control the production, transportation, and sale of the most important products that this country manufactures and distributes.  If, this country will not effectively bring to bear all of its available resources so as to break up these dangerous monopolies of commerce, then these gross disparities of wealth, resources, and influence will continue to favor just the few, at the expense of the many, and thereby subvert our citizenship by making those denizens of this great nation, mere feeble subjects to their corporate kings.

"He who does not weep does not see" -- Victor Hugo

The above quotation comes from Victor Hugo's seminal work, Les Miserables, and such should be taken to heart by each and every one of us.  So too, we read in Holy Scripture, this short passage, "Jesus wept." (John 11: 35)

While this world and the people amongst it, can provide us with times of happiness and joy, it has never been and never will be, nothing but happiness and joy, for there is far too much pain and sorrow that exists throughout society.  So then, all those that try to live only within a construct, in which, they ignore the suffering and pain of mankind, or pretend it doesn’t exist, are the very people that clearly do not see.

To not weep in this world, signifies a personage that does not see the world for what it really is.  Further to  the point, the tears that each of us should shed, while representing many different things at many different times, primarily should be about what is the most obvious thing to see, which is mankind's continuous inhumanity to mankind.  That is to say, there isn't any reason why there has to be wars, or fights, or famine, or any of the other negative things that occur, day-by-day, but these very things, no matter the great prophets and messiahs that have lived alongside us, or the holy books so written, are part and parcel of everyday life, though it need not be that way.

This signifies fundamentally that a huge swath of mankind refuses to learn the most elemental lessons of how to conduct their lives; for those that are unable to see their neighbor as their own self, are truly blind and do not see.  So that, the very first step in correcting wrong behavior is quite obviously to recognize that particular behavior as being wrong, and the second step, which is never going to be easy, is to thereby correct that behavior on a consistent basis so as to fundamentally improve oneself for the benefit of all.

For some of us, that do see, we weep, not just for others, but for our own self, for we know that we have failed to live up to what we could be, and further that we have failed to do the very things that we should be doing.  This doesn't mean that we should stop trying or that we should simply give up, but rather through our own diligence as well as through the help of other good people that care, we must try and try again, for anything of real value, necessitates a consistent and dedicated determination to achieve it.

There are also many different ways to weep, besides just the tears that come forth from our eyes, such as through the abuse of drugs, or through the abuse of alcohol, or through the abuse of others, or through the abuse of our own self; for each of these fundamentally is an acknowledgment that not all is right, in ourselves and in this world, and thereby we weep and will continue to weep, until such a time as we recognize that what we see can actually be changed, and that change begins first with our own self, straightened out, and willing to do what needs to be done, no matter the cost and carried out for as long as it takes, until even, the end of time.

Illusion and reality

Most everyone is familiar with the Bible, and most everyone is familiar with Jesus the Christ, of which, even those that do not believe that Jesus is the son of God, or that all the miracles so professed in the Bible, actually occurred, there is almost always still a respect and appreciation of the moral and ethical lessons that were taught and addressed upon by this Jesus.  However, when it comes to the resurrection of Jesus, there does become even for those of the Christian faith, a divide between those that believe wholly in that resurrection, as opposed to all those that believe that such a resurrection, was at best, perhaps a metaphor, or of good import, but regrettably not literally true.

Many people, especially those in western nations, see their physical body and this physical world as the only absolute reality; so that, without any real deep contemplation, they believe wholly that reality is essentially that which is visible, above all else.  So then, it is true for them to say, that what is visible is reality, and that which is not visible may sometimes be real, but only to the extent that it can be measured by  mankind's instruments in conjunction with adherence to intellectual and scientific theorems.

Yet, as much as they believe their eyes of what is real or not real, even the most ignorant, recognizes that people do age, and that people do change, and that ultimately all that is physical will decay, die and disappear. It therefore follows, that those that believe in that reality appear to be saying that all that is visible is real, yet, at the same time, they are also admitting that all is ever changing, though that change may be minute and of a change process that is often invisible or unnoticeable, but inexorably all does change, and that is the reality that they intuitively believe in.  On the other hand, all miracles that overturn physical laws, such as the raising of the dead, as read in Holy Scripture, or the feeding of the thousands, or the spontaneous healing of those that believe, are considered to be tall tales, merely because it does not fit into their perception of the reality of the laws of this world.

All of this perhaps might make sense, if this world was, for all intents and purposes, the only reality, but, in fact, a world in which all is ever changing, presupposes that such a world is not stable, for the very same person, is an infant, a student, a working adult, and ultimately a retired, old person.  Further to the point, that theory stipulates, that there was a time before birth, when that person did not exist, and that there will be a time after so many years on this earth, when the body will die and ultimately disappear, so that person again, does not exist.   If, this truly is the reality, that there is no existence before physical birth and that thereupon there is no existence after physical death, than obviously it so follows that what is considered to be reality is not actually reality, but is rather an illusion of reality.

It is submitted that this world, and everything in it and upon it, is the illusion, and that which appears to be so real, is merely a story experienced in a temporal physical form; so that the true nature of who and what we really are, never changes, for we are all absolutely immortal, timeless, invincible and an integral part of that which is the One.

Listen to what they say, but then watch what they actually do

Most people like to talk, and especially like to talk about things that involve their own self, but on the other hand, they often aren't so good about listening to what others are saying.  Yet, if we listened more to others, and really paid attention to their words and then to their subsequent actions, we would learn a heck of a lot more about them, and perhaps would be able to be of more relevant assistance to others, by virtue of having listened well and then having watched their ensuing actions.

In point of fact, the words that people speak each and every day are really a very good portal into the psyche of a given individual, so that, rather than trying to spend an inordinate amount of time, talking over others so as to demonstrate our own importance or wisdom, we would serve others better, if we actually carefully listened to their words, but not only that, followed through by then watching and taking into account whether their subsequent actions correlated well or not with the words so spoken by them.

This correlation between the words spoken and subsequent actions is not primarily meant to catch people in their contradictions or hypocrisy, but rather it permits us to create a more complete picture of a given individual, so that we have therefore a better and more thorough understanding of them.  After all, in order to be a good friend, or a good business associate, it is of immense value to actually know the other person in a manner that is accurate, and words being spoken, and goals so expressed, can only be subsequently adjudged correctly if we match up those things with what thereupon occurs.

Further, the more that we know of a given individual, the better we will be able to successfully navigate that relationship, because we are thereby more cognizant of what their words typically mean or don’t mean, by having correlated previous words spoken to subsequent actions, so that, we will, for example, not unnecessarily feel disappointment or rejection when those that have demonstrated their lack of integrity, fail to make good on promises; or, on the other hand, for those that are more modest and undersell themselves, we will thereupon recognize that their words, are often precursors of very good things that will come.

Although there is a multitude of ways to communicate, the most common way though is through the words so spoken, one to another, and if we are unable to give our full attention to what is being spoken, we lose our opportunity to hear well what is being said.  Further, it is important to listen well, for many a person has been supposedly caught unawares by the action of someone that they should have correct and intimate knowledge of, in which, no doubt, good listening, would have detected such a long time ago, and having been detected, perhaps what would occurred, would have been a better understanding between those two parties, and thereby subsequently a different and a more satisfying result.

The more that we pay attention to others, the more that we learn about those others, and good attention begins with good listening and good listeners pay good attention to the correlation between those words so spoken and the actions thereby made.

Dividends and stock appreciation

According to worldbank.org, the total market capitalization of all United States stocks as of 2018 was over $30.4 trillion, in which the overall GDP of the entire United States at the conclusion of 2018 was according to the stlouisfed.org, just under $21 trillion.  The stock market of the United States, though regulated, is an open market, in which those that wish to purchase or sell stocks do so, typically utilizing a brokerage firm, in which the price of the equities so being bought is determined by the free hand of the marketplace.  That is to say, though pundits might indicate all the supposed rational reasons why a stock is going either up or down, in regards to earnings, revenue, dividend yield, future projections, the overall economy, the prevailing interest rate of the Federal reserve, GDP numbers, inflation expectations, and so on, the bottom line is that the price of individual equities at any given point, is what the market will bear.

Whether the stock market is rational is debatable, of which, all things being equal, if the stock market really was totally rational 100 percent of the time, then most days, in which particular equities had no salient news to report, the stock of those companies would be quiescent, but in actuality, stocks move up and down by some percentage, usually within a small range, each and every day that the market is open.  Further, for each stock traded, there must be a seller to go along with the buyer, of which, logic tells us, that both sides must feel that they are getting a fair bargain, or else no trade would take place; yet, in the scheme of things, it would appear that one party probably comes out better than the other, because no doubt, each party feels that they have been on the right side of the trade.

Additionally, when it comes to stock prices, there is an ingrain prejudice for the prices of equities to rise, as the higher a given stock price is, the more profit on paper, buyers of that stock obtain; in addition to the fact that many companies have stock options that only come "into the money" when the stock rises over a period of time, as well as compensation for senior executives are often built around the appreciation of the stock price. So then, the major players in the stock market, including the market makers and brokerage firms, desire for the price to rise, and in general, through also the effects of inflation, equity prices in America over the last hundred years, have certainly risen.

There are many stocks that offer a dividend payment attached to their stock, of which those dividend payments are periodically paid out to stockholders of record, during the year.  At the present time, as reported by multpl.com, the S&P 500 yield in aggregate is under 2 percent, whereas back in 1979 it was 5.24 percent, and in 1950, it was an astonishing 7.44 percent.  The fundamental difference between dividends and stock appreciation is that dividends are absolutely real in the sense that real money from the company's profits are distributed to the stockholders; whereas stock appreciation is something that is not only never guaranteed but can be rather fickle, for a given stock can lose 15 or 20 percent, or even more in one day.  Therefore, those that place their faith that the stock price of a given stock will ever go upward or even remain stable day-by-day, have failed to perceive the difference between cash in hand, as compared to cash on paper, in which, they are clearly not the same thing.

Understanding crime

America does do a very commendable job of keeping track of all sorts of statistics and from those statistics is able often to see patterns and therefore to solve puzzles.  When it comes to crime, the conversation of such, often seems to clearly miscomprehend those numbers, so that reciting how many crimes there are per 100,000 people, or the murder rate in a given city, as proof positive, that things are either improving or getting worse, is fundamentally looking at crime through the wrong lens.

In point of fact, most crime, that is not white collar crime, is often localized, and it is localized because criminals typically ply their trade in areas of the city that they congregate in and are intimately familiar with.  So then, in a given city, crime is never going to be uniform from one community to the next but rather we see that some communities have a very high proportion of crime in comparison to their population base, whereas other parts of the community have virtually no crime, whatsoever.  The reason that this is so, is myriad, of which relevant attributes of crime or the lack thereof, comes down to the income level of that particular area, the schools, the parks, the family structure, the educational level, the density of population, the age of population, and so on and so forth.  In other words, for instance, an area of the community in which all the homes are very nice, single family homes, that necessitate a good amount of wealth to own one, in which, these homes are surrounded by no high-density apartments and in addition, have the accouterments of good shopping stores as well as other good infrastructure nearby, aren't going to have much crime, for the very people that live and congregate there, do not have the conditions that would nurture, criminality.  On the other hand, areas of high density in conjunction with low income, as well as dilapidated homes, and poor infrastructure are going to often suffer more than fair share of crime, because the conditions of that community, pretty much creates crime.

That is to say, the lack of capital, the lack of good infrastructure, the lack of good schools, the lack of good family structure, the lack of education, and the lack of opportunity, poses a clear and present danger to the not only the safety but the overall demeanor and temperature of a given community.  The reason that this is so, is that crime, while it may have many fathers, fundamentally originates from people that are impoverished in the sense of their lack of opportunity, hope, and money.  Those that have little or nothing, and further do not have a lot of constructive things that are available for them to do, are going to be susceptible to criminal activities.

All of this means, that most crime and criminal activities are within the communities that are impoverished to begin with, and while law and order resources devoted to eradicating such crime in those neighborhoods may indeed find much success in prosecuting that criminal element, it will not in and of itself, eliminate criminality, until such time as the conditions that create crime, are ameliorated fundamentally.  While there are all sorts of pundits that demand that people own up to the responsibility for their bad actions, those pundits doing the talking, don't often come from milieus that are hopeless, let alone, forsaken.   

The bottom line is that to find crime and to find the criminals behind that crime is easy.  To reduce and to eliminate crime is the difficult task, and it is not something that simply comes down to "just say no," but rather is dependent upon all the people of this great nation living within a construct in which each of them truly has a good home, a living wage, fair and equal justice applied to all, and a good helping hand for all those in need.  America has the capital to do exactly that, but has made a conscious choice not to do so.  The crime, it suffers from, is clearly the result of a system that fundamentally fails to live up to the tenets of justice, egalitarianism, fairness, hope, and opportunity.  

That then is the true crime.

To tell the truth

We read in Holy Scripture: "… for this reason I have come into the world, that I should testify to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth listens to my voice," (John 18: 37).  Further to the point, in our justice system, we are obligated to “to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.”  In all this, it is clear that telling the truth is of upmost importance and thereby forms the bedrock of good civil society.  The reason that truth, and that truth being the whole truth is so important, is that each of us, through our actions and our words, day-by-day, are either part and parcel of that whole truth, and thereby are agents of honesty and integrity, or we are instead working at odds against that truth.

Intuitively we recognize that it is extremely difficult to legitimately complain or to get upset over anyone that is fully speaking the truth, even if that truth is damaging to our self, because truth, in and of itself, in all circumstances, is the highest standard that anyone can be held to; and though, we can unfairly justify our anger directed against someone that has spoken the truth in a manner in which we see that person as a "snitch" or a "rat", it is, ultimately, a futile complaint, for that which is true justifiably supersedes our own preference to be not exposed to the consequences of that truth, when such is an inconvenience for us.

The most basic reason why most everyone does not speak the truth at all times, and therefore ends up lying to others as well as to themselves, is almost always based upon protecting their own self, as well as their own reputation, and further to the point, demonstrates an unwillingness to face the consequences of that truth being told at that time.  The bottom line is that people lie, tell falsehoods and stories because they do not want to be shamed or to be humiliated in front of others and especially do not want to be punished for it.

Those that tell the whole truth, even under the most extreme of conditions, and even under the knowledge that the truth told at the here and now, will subsequently have, meaningful and negative consequences for them, are absolutely courageous for doing so.  On the other hand, all those that lie are basically cowards, whereas, all those that tell the truth are basically brave; for the former are often able to avoid punishment or even detection of such lies, so thereby they suffer no ill consequences for having done so; whereas the latter are those that having told the truth may suffer directly for having done so.

The more that one lies, the easier it is to continue in those lies, especially when no one else is apparently cognizant of it.  So too the more that one tells the whole truth, the easier it is to continue to tell that truth, for those that are truthful, are cognizant that who and what they really are, as represented by what they say and do, is absolutely relevant and meaningful.

It would seem by the way that the world operates, that all those that selectively lie in a manner in which the perception by others is that they are truthful and honest, would seem to effectively be a successful, though somewhat compromised position to live by.  What is missing from the equation, however, is that all those that have told the truth in the here and now, and perhaps have suffered from time-to-time for having done so -- clearly have paid the toll in their life by having testified to that truth; whereas all those that have taken on the guise of integrity but are not, have not yet paid their toll, and past due tolls always cost more, and sometimes they do cost a lot more.

Whatever happened to the revolution of 1776?

Not every revolution is successful, and further to the point, not every revolution is true to its cause for that revolution.  A case in point is that the revolutionary document that the colony representatives signed their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor to was the Declaration of Independence.  That Declaration had the upmost relevancy back in 1776, and should still have the upmost relevancy for all of us, today.

The problem with this country today is that it does not truly honor that Declaration of Independence.  To wit, in that Declaration, we read: "He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies…" and further:  "He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power."  America has not had a congressional declared war since World War II, yet it is always at what is for all intents and purposes: war; or it is taking war to such amorphous beings as "global terrorism", in which, the United States doesn't just have a standing army, but rather has a massive global military footprint as well as a truly gargantuan military budget, of which its "defense" expenditure is more than half of its discretionary federal budget, and subsequently represents in total as reported by nationalpriorities.org, "37 percent of the total…" military expenditures worldwide, of which the United States population is not even 5% of the world, at large.  Further, it doesn't seem to matter who the Chief Executive in the White House is, or the makeup of the legislature, for the military and its unelected leaders, seemingly gets its way, every single time, thereby making the technology-industrial-military complex effectively superior to civil power.

Our Declaration broke our bonds from hereditary aristocracy, yet, today, America has developed its own unique aristocracy, established by not only the incredible power and wealth of today's everlasting transnational corporations, but also in particular with dynasties such as the Bush family, the Walton family, the Koch family, the Rockefeller family, the Kennedy family, and the Mars family.  These corporations and families are able to not just maintain their power and influence generation by generation but often continue to augment it, because the money and assets that they control and own are not effectively taxed, thereby leaving these dynasties with even more money and even more power.

Further, the whole purpose of establishing our independence from Great Britain was to establish a government of, for, and by the people, under the consent of those people and for the benefit of the people.  Instead, as time has gone by, this government has morphed into being a power unto itself, answerable only to those that control it, and primarily for the benefit of those select and privileged few, and always at the expense of the many.  Rather than being transparent and answerable to the people, today's government is opaque, secretive, and oppressive, for it primarily sees the people only as entities that should be obedient to the government, and fully compliant thereby to the government's decrees.

The iron hand of British aristocracy at the expense of its loyal subjects; in addition to the heavy boots of oppression and unjust taxation against its American colonies, led to the revolution of those subjects, of which, the abiding objective of that revolution was to see that each citizen of this new government, would be an equal member of it, with a voice, with freedom, and with the liberty to pursue happiness as those people so saw fit.  Today, that dream is effectively in shatters, for this government and its agents are the new aristocracy, signifying that the new boss is so much the same as the old boss.

Quid pro quo capitalism

America wishes to believe that it is the epitome of capitalism at its best.  This, unfortunately, is not true, for in many respects capitalism in an era in which Federal, State, and local governments have an enormous amount of power, resources, as well as the almighty dollar at their beck and call --in addition to the "revolving door" of private enterprise personnel interchangeably taking on the reins of governmental rules and regulation, has transformed capitalism into a construct in which, it is much more about those that wish to transact business and be successful in it, are connected at the hip with those that are an integral part of the actual playing field that business is regulated and conducted in.

This really means that governmental agencies rather than representing the people as a whole, and thereby creating and implementing rules and regulations meant for the benefit of those people, have actually circumvented their duties to often work instead on behalf of the desires of private enterprise to the exclusion of fairness and duty.  In other words, the business world knows the value of getting along and going along with governmental agencies and has evolved into doing just that. In addition, governmental agencies understand the value of getting along and going along with private enterprise, for they know that as these enterprises are benefited, economic doors of opportunity open for them, to take personal advantage of.

This thus means that more than ever we live in a quid pro quo capitalistic world, in which governmental agencies bestows favors onto specific corporations, whether that be land grants, taxation rules, labor regulations, or just about anything of value, in return of which government receives inside information as well as the implicit recognition that these corporations now owe specific favors to their government, of which, when that government comes calling, as they will, these corporations will willingly reply.

As a matter of course in a quid pro quo capitalistic society, this thus means, that the big corporations will continue to swallow up the small and innovative corporations, so that these big corporations can not only consolidate their power and increase their market share as well as their profitability, but just as importantly, be that one stop source for the government to turn to, when the government requires "patriotic" help and thereupon calls upon them.  For the government, their calling card is ever that these corporations are loyal and obedient to the needs and dictates of that government, for governmental beneficence and cooperation is understood to be, conditional, and those corporations that do not comprehend such, will suffer greatly for their lack of foresight.

For many people, the fact that the government and private enterprise often work hand-in-glove sounds not only efficient, but appropriate, but this misses the forest for the trees, for when the government and private enterprise meld into one, this thus means that the people, are no longer sovereign and thereby masters of a government that is by and for the people, but rather that the government in conjunction with these large corporations, that have joined together, are permitted to extract from the people all that they can get,  for that is the only value that they see in them.

The real reason why there is so much violence in America

In advanced nations, America is the most violent of them all, of which, no doubt, because the availability of firearms is so prevalent and the usage of these lethal and damaging guns are so frequent, the end result is much more violence, then other comparable countries that have strict or stricter gun control laws.  This would seem to indicate that stricter gun laws in America would clearly help to reduce violence in America, which no doubt would be true, but even with these laws successfully applied, America would still be the outlier of comparable countries in violence, for some very basic reasons, as discussed below.

What is absolutely relevant to violence, is the inequality of society within America, in which, Americans readily are aware that there are some people, that have incredible wealth and the material assets and accouterments that go with that, and then there are those others that have absolutely nothing.  Further to the point, those that have nothing, see visualize proof, through media of all types, that some of the most successful are, in fact, of the same race or social milieu as they are, which can serve as either a conceivable inspiration for them or as a searing indictment.   This, thus means, that those that have nothing, often feel a great deal of shame and humiliation for being nothing, and intuitively know that based on their limited skill set, and the dead-end neighborhood that they live at, that their chance of ever successfully exiting the futility of the situation is well-nigh zero.  So then, for those have nothing, and literally have nothing to therefore lose, they are going to be susceptible to desiring to make their mark in a manner in which they will receive some sort of respect and acknowledgment that they are a true force to be reckoned with.

Again, this humiliation and shame, comes about from the recognition that the circumstances that these people live and congregate in, are pretty much hopeless, and thereby the only way to receive some necessary respect from one's peers is to achieve it through the type of action that somehow commands respect, which often comes down not to random acts of kindness, but rather purposeful acts of targeted violence, that demonstrates determined resolve to get things done in a manner in which it will be properly recognized by others of importance, as righteous.

In truth, the people that are most prone to violence are the one and same as those that we judge in a manner, rightly or wrongly, as of being of little value or worth.  Further to the point, we do not value and we do respect those that are ill educated, socially maladapted, impoverished, lazy, and shiftless, of which, the most fundamental reason why there are so many in America that are lacking good and proper attributes, comes down to the fact that we have segregated certain portions of our population from the mainstream, and provided these people with little or nary of what they need to become something of value, and then express surprise or are dismayed at the violence so displayed in these neighborhoods, when they strike out in their cry of desperation in the only manner that they know that at least will get some sort of response from a country that has turned all so cold.

Incarceration and non-compensated involuntary servitude

According to cnn.com, "…nearly 2.2 million adults were held in America's prisons and jails at the end of 2016," of which a portion of those so locked up are subject to being coerced or compelled into providing labor services either directly within that prison or jail, or to be outsourced to certain companies or government agencies so as to perform uncompensated or extremely low paying compensated jobs.  To a certain extent, those incarcerated, with little or nothing to do of substance, are amendable to performing such work duties, but to do so, for no pay or extremely low pay as well as having to deal with possibly hazardous working conditions, should be seen for what it is, outright exploitation of labor for the benefit of those so employing these incarcerated people.

While critics might so indicate, that prisoners should not be compensated at the prevailing labor rate as well as they should not be subject to the rules and regulations that Federal and State laws so dictate, because these people owe a debt to society for having been duly convicted, this presupposes that the very nature of being incarcerated  means that certain laws in regards to worker safety, compensation, and work conditions, somehow do not apply to those that are in a current status of being incarcerated.  If this be so, then it would mean that for any municipality or its equivalency, that when labor is short or budgets are tight, such as, for example, in harvesting season, that it would be pro-active and well-nigh prudent for the policing forces of that municipality to arrest and to convict as many people as is possible, for dubious crimes such as vagrancy or criminal mischief, so as to build up a convict labor force that could thereby be exploited as cheap and ready labor.

The thing about incarcerated laborers as opposed to all those that are not compelled or coerced into working, is that incarcerated laborers are prone to being overworked and to suffer to a degree that others would not readily tolerate, because those others have the willful capacity to walk away, whereas incarcerated laborers do not. Further, the overall health of an incarcerated laborer and even the long term endurance of an incarcerated laborer are of little concern to the employer of such, because these convicts represent something that is merely seen as temporary help, and thereby of no compelling concern to those "employing" them.  This so means that incarcerated laborers, in which appropriate labor and workplace rules and regulations do not apply, or are not effectively applied for them, are not only susceptible to being exploited -- but are exploited by those so employing them, because the ramifications of something going wrong or of being adjudged not appropriate, whatever it may be, is often negligible, whereas the upside of the usage of free or nearly free labor is quite good.

Those that are incarcerated have it bad enough already that they should not thereby be seen as a labor resource to be exploited, nor should they be placed within working conditions that circumvent a safe and appropriate working environment.  To the extent that the government or private enterprise wishes to employ incarcerated laborers, such should be an option, but only should be done in good compliance with the Fair Labor Standards Act as well as other applicable legislation.

The superrich run roughshod over the many

America is the richest nation in the world, yet, even the most cursory of looks, indicates that the wealth so held, shows a quite dramatic difference in the huge amounts of disparity achieved, between the haves and have-nots.  It perhaps would be one thing if the superrich achieved what they have, through the fairest of means, but the reality is that, this often isn't so, for the superrich are gifted at tilting contracts, laws, rules and regulations to its favor.  Nevertheless, there are means to rectify such, by, for instance, taxing the superrich at a much higher progressive tax rate; and yet another way is to put a cap on what the superrich are able to possess and grow, by the implementation of laws that even out the playing field in a manner in which those that have garnered huge advantages, whether fair or foul, or precluded from adding even more to it, so that through divestment, or the breaking up of consortiums or entities those that have become too powerful and too dominant are sedated.

Still, it might be asked, how is that the superrich, a distinct minority, are able to become superrich in the first place?  The most straightforward answer to this question is the understanding that those that are privy to inside and specific actionable information about others; whether these others are individuals, companies, government entities, or organizations, are often able to harvest that information to their benefit.  Further to the point, for individuals, for instance, most everyone has some sort of value in the sense that they have worked and earned money and therefore has assets, or alternatively there are those others that are the beneficiaries of some sort of government benefits of which how and where those benefits in aggregate are thereby utilized have definite value.   Additionally, there are those, specifically the youth that though they have little material worth as of the present, are susceptible to being molded in a manner that their future value can be successfully manipulated and exploited.

So that, the superrich sees the third most populous nation in the world, as well as a nation with a reach that is truly global, as a real opportunity to make money; especially when such a country implicitly encourages and allows personal information of great detail and accuracy such as school records, personal income and assets, family background, detailed demographics, and social media of all types to be available, in one form or another, for well placed organizations and people.  This so indicates that all those that possess actionable and accurate information of the many, are in the catbird seat of being able to monetize that knowledge and information in a manner in which those organizations and certain privy people are going to make a lot of money, especially when there are very few that possess and have thoroughly analyzed and cogitated such information.

It is really as simple as this, when some specific entity, knows everything about a given individual, of what activates and interests that individual, and this is multiplied by those millions of individuals, then these given entities do indeed have the treasure map that will lead them to that endless pot of gold, and by virtue of having that wealth of found money, they will be able to utilize such to protect as well as to augment their interests, at the expense of the people as a whole, who essentially have had their most precious resources extracted from them.

Money should mainly be seen as a facilitator of trade

A lot of people value their monetary worth by the amount of dollars or its equivalency that they have as assets.  While, this does make for easy comparisons when people compared their assets in a dollar denomination; this is probably not the best way to actually measure true wealth, for in an era in which the dollar is backed by nothing, and is therefore a fiat currency, this so means that dollars in and of themselves, have worth only to the extent that they are valued by those exchanging their labor or goods for them; and should those that utilize dollars as a medium of exchange, lose their faith in the stability and/or the value of those dollars, such could be catastrophic for all those that have placed their faith in physical or electronic dollars, above all.

In fact, since the United States decoupled gold from the dollar bill in 1971, the value of those 1971 dollars have depreciated to such a large extent, that a single dollar bill of 1971 would need to have grown to about $6.20 in today's money in order to have maintained its purchasing value over that period of time.  This so proves the point that any of those that buried their dollars in a treasure chest in their backyard, and then recover such in the present day, would find to their dismay that those dollars have definitely not appreciated in value, but rather have depreciated considerably in value.

All of the above basically means, that those that store dollars and do not invest such, or do not buy anything with those extra dollars, or do not receive interest payments on those dollars, have in their hands, something that will consistently depreciate in value over time, which is the cardinal opposite of something that has stable or appreciating value to it.  This so signifies, that to look upon money as denominated in dollars as being a stable or as an appreciating asset is a mistake, for dollars clearly are depreciating, therefore the object of the exercise for those that have an inventory of dollars must be to find a medium to exchange those dollars into something that is stable or appreciating, for the mere long term holding of them, is ultimately a losers' game.

Further, it is important to emphasize that dollars should more correctly be seen as a medium of exchange and as a facilitator of trade, of which, by having dollars serve this purpose, it makes it far easier to receive one's payment for labor, to buy goods, and to conduct trade of all types in a straightforward and reliable manner.  To the extent that people use dollars as a facilitator of trade, and of doing business of all types, then the usage of this slowly depreciating currency, is probably just fine, because of its universality and convenience for all parties involved.

However, it cannot be emphasized enough, that dollars fundamentally have no intrinsic value for they are relatively easy to make as well as to print, and further that today's issued dollars are not backed up at the present time by any tangible goods; so that, astute people recognize that dollars are really a means to facilitate the trading of goods and labor, and thereby they make it their point to invest money so earned and to spend those dollars in a manner in which they receive something of value in return, and are prudent enough to know that today's money is fiat paper, and paper does not hold up well over the ravages of time.

Impulse and negative outlooks

For mature and well balanced adults, when given a choice between some sort of immediate gratification, such as $10 today, as compared to $20 in one week; or a favorite snack right now, as compared to two of the same snack in thirty minutes, the determination of that choice is for those type of people, rather straightforward, for they clearly see the benefits of utilizing time to their advantage.  On the other hand, those that are lacking in good impulse control as well as those that within their mindset are suffering from a negative emotion such as sadness, or regret, or depression, are often going to give in to the immediate gratification, not necessarily because they truly believe that such is the better choice, but rather because it brings to them, an immediate reward, which they believe will make them feel better, right now.

So then, though one can give plenty of credit to those that are able to weigh different choices and values in a manner in which their decision makes logical sense and is overall beneficial for them -- as in all those that delay taking a certain portion of their salary today, in order to place instead some portion of their salary into a retirement account; it is important to recognize that one of the salient reasons why two people that appear to have similar circumstances, do come to diametrically different decisions, lies not only within their impulsiveness in general, but also within their mindset and viewpoint.

That is to say, those that are impulsive as well as those that consistently choose immediate gratification, aren't necessarily that way because they lack self-control, though they might, but rather it has a lot to do with their psyche and their outlook at that particular juncture in life.  For all those that have little or nothing, and are additionally use to having promises by others that they respect and look up to, broken, again and again, are also going to be the type of people that when given a choice between the proverbial "bird in the hand" as compared to "two in the bush" -- will have within their life experience a firm basis for the logical reasoning of the superiority of taking what they can take right now, as opposed to a promise of more that may well be broken.

All of the above really means that how our mind is wired most definitely affects our susceptibility to offers and temptations brought to our attention.  This is the reason why two people can watch the same commercial in which one person is completely tuned out, whereas another will be enticed by it.  In point of fact, a lot of advertising tries to appeal to the impulsive nature of our psyche, and especially focuses in on those that have vulnerabilities in which the advertisement pretty much is offering something in the here and now that will make things all better, which overrides the common sense of the person, which often intuitively recognizes that what is being promised today, seems really too good to be true, though they wish to believe that it is not.

It so follows that when it comes to self-control, those that have stable and secure lives are often going to have far more self-control, than those that come from dysfunctional families and stressful situations.    This signifies that where we come from in our personal situation, affects far more of who and what we are, than is often recognized, for often where our psyche is at, makes a substantial difference in the subsequent reasoning thereby made.

Entrenched poverty

The United States is the third most populous nation in the world, and though it has plenty of land, the most entrenched poverty is located primarily within the core of the segregated inner city of which those denizens are essentially isolated from society at large in the sense that they often lack ready access to good housing, safe neighborhoods, good schools, safe parks, good employment opportunities and so on and so forth.  In point of fact, those that live in areas of which there is no good employment within a short commuting distance, as well as lacking ready access to good healthcare, while also suffering from substandard schools; subject its residents to being stuck within their dire circumstances, and these citizens are especially vulnerable to being perpetually caught within a cycle of poverty that they are never able to successfully generate the escape velocity to ever move out from.

America does not have an abundance of jobs that pay a living wage to begin with, and certainly has even less of those jobs available for people that lack the proper means to even be able to consistently arrive at work at the proper time without having to go through endless hurdles; in addition to many of these same people often being, ill educated, while also lacking in the intricacy of the knowledge of appropriate social niceties.  Quite frankly, most employers, though they may talk about how they will hire people without experience, only mean that in the general sense of people that appear to be fundamentally bushy-tailed and really ready to work, and thereby to gainfully take on the responsibilities of such.

In many cases when it comes to employment, those that suffer from entrenched poverty are at a great disadvantage, for employers are often seeking only those that have a reliable means of transportation to get to work, of which, those without access to an automobile are reduced to public transportation which may or may not be viable for them, or have to lean on other means of transportation, which may or may not be cost effective or always available.  Additionally, many employers need a ready means to communicate with their employees, which basically necessitates good and reliable internet access as well as a cell phone, which those that are impoverished may not have.  So too, when it comes to employers, those potential employees that are illiterate or ill educated, are going to often be left behind, because employers often do not have the patience or extra money to deal with employees that aren't functionally literate.

Additionally, many jobs that people locate don't come directly from help wanted ads, but rather come through networking with other people, and those that are especially impoverished and isolated within their own milieu, often have not developed the social capital that provides them with that desired and effective networking option.  So then, those living within the ghettos of entrenched urban poverty, are for all practical purposes, functionally ignored by governmental institutions as well as private enterprise, for these people are perceived to be of little utility or value, and are further harmed by their often clear unpreparedness of being able to step  up and to be of profitable service.  This thus signifies that those that suffer from entrenched poverty are isolated from society at large, and are marginalized to such an extent that they cease to exist in the eyes of those that have the power to effect positive change for them.

Finding the living God

There is a multitude of ways to discover and to take in the word of God, for instance, through one's Bible, through Church or Bible study, through the listening of sermons, or through the reading of sermons, through intuition, and through mediation, and pretty much through any medium that can be imagined.  All of this is necessary, for to merely hear the word of God, but to not take in the word of God, so that God's word is a living and breathing part of one's actuation in life, is ultimately to not be fully immersed in the word, and those that are merely lukewarm, have not discovered the true nourishing word that satisfies completely.

Because each one of us is different the pathway to our finding the living God, is going to be different for each of us, so that, though there may be many paths that can be taken, the ultimate destination from those paths is always going to be the same for all.  So then, in order to stay focus on the prize of all prizes, the most important concept to fully grasp is that God is our ever present and living Being, of which this is absolutely relevant, for our God is eternally omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent.  Therefore, it is our ever present desire that our mentors, as well as our forthright sojourners are of material aid in assisting us in finding the living God.

It is important to note that there is little point in reading scripture in a manner that seems to stipulate "that was then, but this is now," as if the sermons, metaphors, and words of wisdom, meant something back then, but has little relevancy to this modern day age.  That, unfortunately, is the hubris of the present age, where there are those that somehow don't believe that previous civilizations from two millennium ago could possibly have relevancy, today; but yet we read in Holy Scripture that "…there is no new thing under the sun,"(Ecclesiastes 1: 9).  Which, is just another way of saying that the essence of and the troubles of mankind are not new.

The only water that fully refreshes the body is water that is not stagnant, but is instead a running, flowing, and living water; so then, the only God that will fully satisfy us, is one that is alive.  It is up to each one of us, to understand that surface knowledge of surface things is never going to get us very far in life; but rather, we must put ourselves into the position to wake up in a "cold sweat" to the full comprehension that there is nothing of more value, than the whole Truth, and that our soul will not rest until we find such.

In order to do exactly that, recognize that God speaks to us each and every day, if only we would really try to find and to thereby listen to that quiet, still voice that ever calls to us; for God loses sight of no one and nobody, and God will never rest, no matter how long it seemingly takes, for each one of His sheep, to return back to the fold that has left His good pasture.  Make it your point, and delay not, to find the one and only living God, for all else, no matter how bright it might shine, or how sparkling it glitters, are mere counterfeits to that which completes us.